What Will Lakers Do With Amnesty Provision Regarding Kobe Bryant? Reviewed by Momizat on . For the last 72 hours people in Los Angeles have been asking all sorts of questions. With Kobe Bryant out for the foreseeable future due to a torn Achilles, the For the last 72 hours people in Los Angeles have been asking all sorts of questions. With Kobe Bryant out for the foreseeable future due to a torn Achilles, the Rating:
You Are Here: Home » Editorials » What Will Lakers Do With Amnesty Provision Regarding Kobe Bryant?

What Will Lakers Do With Amnesty Provision Regarding Kobe Bryant?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

NBA: Golden State Warriors at Los Angeles LakersFor the last 72 hours people in Los Angeles have been asking all sorts of questions. With Kobe Bryant out for the foreseeable future due to a torn Achilles, the team is suddenly forced to expedite the post-Kobe era. While everybody expects Bryant to be back sooner rather than later, the team will certainly explore some different options while looking towards the future. But one of those options, apparently, isn’t to use their Amnesty provision on Kobe.

—-Want to show off your Kobe love? Check out this VINO t-shirt!—-

According to Serena Winters of Lakers Nation, team general manager Mitch Kupchak is not ready to entertain the Amnesty option with Bryant.

“That’s not even something that we’ve discussed,” Kupchak said. “That’s the furthest thing from our mind right now.”

But how much of that is Mitch being coy and saving face in front of the media? I won’t even dive into the PR disaster that letting Kobe go for essentially nothing more than money would be, but the reality of the situation is that in some ways it may make sense for the team to consider it. Bryant is owed a ton of money next season, and even though he’s still one of the most productive guys in the league, the new CBA is getting more and more ruthless on teams that break the cap. Especially in consecutive seasons

So what would it take for the team to legitimately consider using their Amnesty provision on Bryant?

I asked the resident CBA guru, Larry Coon, that very same question.

“I wouldn’t be so sure that the Lakers wouldn’t amnesty Kobe. If it becomes clear that he’s going to miss the entire season, then a Kobe amnesty would essentially get them out of the luxury tax – eg: if they would have been $30 million over the tax line, their tax would have been $85 million. This would reduce it to zero (assuming Dwight stays. If he leaves then the Lakers would have about $10M in cap room).”

This is a very different tale than the one being told by Kupchak. While that’s not a surprise, the financial benefits of getting out from under Kobe’s contract are certainly numerous. Instead of the team being forced to bite a nearly-$90 million luxury tax bill, they suddenly find themselves with excess cap room.

Still, even with this knowledge, Coon doesn’t expect the team to ship Bryant out unless he’s way behind schedule on his Achilles rehabilitation.

“I think they wait until July to evaluate Kobe. If it looks like he’s going to be out the year (especially given their 2014 plan – see below), then they have a serious discussion about it.”

If the team does hold onto Bryant, which in all honesty I am expecting them to do, who gets the Amnesty ax? After holding off on using their Amnesty abilities the last two summers, the team might not be so patient this time around.NBA: Dallas Mavericks at Los Angeles Lakers

There are four Amnesty candidates – Blake, MWP, Pau and Kobe. Blake saves them about $17M, Metta about $31M, Pau about $67M, and Kobe, as I said, gets them out of the tax completely. Two additional considerations: 1) You don’t want to amnesty someone when you can trade them, because you still have to pay their salary and you don’t have the opportunity to get assets in return. Pau is certainly tradable, so I don’t think they Amnesty him. 2) If you have to pay the same amount to replace an amnestied player, then you haven’t gained anything (in fact you’ve lost, since you have to pay the salary of both). This makes Blake unlikely.

If this is what ends up playing out, but World Peace ends up opting out of his contract like he’s stated he might do, it’s entirely possible the Lakers once again choose to ignore their Amnesty abilities. With Gasol playing at a high level over the course of the past several weeks, he’s once again proven himself to be a valuable asset that other teams would be willing to trade for. And, as Coon mentioned, the fact that they would essentially be paying Blake’s replacement the same amount of money they would be paying Blake to go away seems completely implausible.

—-Want to know more about Kobe Bryant? Check out his bio here!—-

So the Lakers, for now, are stuck in a tricky situation. It’s obviously far too soon to decide whether or not Bryant is a serious Amnesty candidate, but their other options aren’t much more clear. For now, it seems that the most likely scenario would involve the team letting World Peace go if he does choose to return for the final season of his contract. But until these things have been decided, the team will continue to keep their options on the table and try to decide what the best move is going forward.


In case you missed it, be sure to check out what Mitch Kupchak had to say about the Lakers amnestying Kobe Bryant!

Don’t forget to click here to subscribe to our Lakers Nation YouTube Channel!

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

About The Author

Daniel is the former Editor-in-Chief of LakersNation. He has also written for SLAM, ESPN and other various publications. Follow Daniel on Twitter @danielbuergeLA

Number of Entries : 1606
  • Ryan

    Amnestying Kobe makes business sense. But its not only about the money. A kobe-amnesty will leave a bitter taste in the mouth of every Kobe fanatic, every Laker fanatic. Ingratitude is the right term to describe the amnesty-Kobe idea!

    • Terrence

      That’s why they say only if Kobe is going to miss all of next season. Current timeline is back 6-9 months, which is actually very quick for an achilles. Average is around a year. Amnesty does not mean the Lakers don’t have to pay him anymore. Amnesty merely makes his contract not count against the cap.

  • Matt Hanson

    Kobe should step up and take less money for next year. That will allow the Lakers to keep all of their key players. He doesn’t need the money. He makes more in endorsements anyways. If he wants a 6th ring, thats his best chance.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jim.proper.7 Jim Proper

      The way the CBA works a player cannot restructure their contract, as they can in the NFL. In the NBA the contracts are fully guaranteed unless the player or team has options written in. Kobe could take less money to re-sign the following year, as he will be an UFA, but cannot help the team until his contract has run its course.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | © 2014 Medium Large, LLC. All Rights Reserved

Medium Large, LLC - All data and information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of the National Basketball Association (NBA), the Los Angeles Lakers, it's employees, or its’ affiliates. LakersNation.com is an independent fan site and not associated with or represent National Basketball Association or the Los Angeles Lakers. Furthermore, LakersNation.com makes no representations as to accuracy, suitability, or validity of any information on this website and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

Scroll to top