Home
Joakim Noah Receives $50,000 Fine Compared to Kobe’s $100,000 Reviewed by Momizat on . During last night's Game 3 between the Chicago Bulls and the Miami Heat, Bulls forward Joakim Noah directed a homophobic slur at one of the fans inside the Amer During last night's Game 3 between the Chicago Bulls and the Miami Heat, Bulls forward Joakim Noah directed a homophobic slur at one of the fans inside the Amer Rating:
You Are Here: Home » Editorials » Joakim Noah Receives $50,000 Fine Compared to Kobe’s $100,000

Joakim Noah Receives $50,000 Fine Compared to Kobe’s $100,000

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

During last night’s Game 3 between the Chicago Bulls and the Miami Heat, Bulls forward Joakim Noah directed a homophobic slur at one of the fans inside the American Airlines Arena. The slur was the same one used by Lakers star Kobe Bryant about a month ago.

For the incident Kobe Bryant was fined $100,000, and the league said that such behavior was completely unacceptable. However, the news was released today that Noah would receive only a $50,000 fine after committing the same offense. This immediately began a controversy as people analyzed the league’s decisions.

Many feel that Noah’s fine should mirror Bryant’s since the offense was practically the same. The league’s remarks on the situation were that Bryant was fined more because his remarks were directed at an official. That argument seems strange when you consider the fact that Noah’s were directed at a paying customer. If this is the league’s reasoning behind the fine people will declare that the league cares more about protecting their own employees than their customers, which is not going to be good for public relations.

Another argument that seems more relevant to me is the proportions of the fines based on each player’s salary. Bryant made $24 million this past season while Noah brought home only $3 million. In terms of percentages, Noah did have a more damaging fine than Bryant. However, the problem with this argument is that the league didn’t state it as a reason for the decreased fine. They only mentioned the intent of the slurs as their reasoning behind the decision.

There are several reasons that seem plausible as to why the league would not fine Noah as much as Bryant. The salary issue is one, but Bryant is also a much bigger star than Noah, and therefore a more direct example of the NBA’s public image. Bryant is a global icon, and is still the face of the league to many people around the world. The league may have felt the need to make an example out of Bryant so that their most popular figures would know not to commit such mindless infractions.

While those reasons may all make sense to me, it is still puzzling that the league didn’t state them as factors in their decision. If the league based their decision purely on the fact that Bryant’s was directed at an official while Noah’s was directed at a fan, they got it wrong. If they would have stated that the other extenuating factors came into play when handing out Noah’s fine then I believe the decision would have been justified.

Regardless, the league’s decision is going to raise eyebrows around the league. Players already have stated their displeasure with the league’s punishments on the court as they struggled to come to terms with the bizarre technical foul rules that were implemented this season. By not clearly stating their reasoning while fining players different amounts for the same offense, the NBA has created more questions than answers. This time, the league got it wrong.

[phpbay]Los Angeles Lakers, 3, “”, “”[/phpbay]

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

About The Author

Daniel is the former Editor-in-Chief of LakersNation. He has also written for SLAM, ESPN and other various publications. Follow Daniel on Twitter @danielbuergeLA

Number of Entries : 1606
  • gmacc

    It’s b.s.!!! If I commit a crime I should get lesser time cuz I make less? The offense was the same, if not worse cuz it was directed at a fan. So a guy who hits a ref should get the same punishment, actually, a worse punishment, than Artest for hitting a fan. Right?

  • http://twitter.com/iamraena iamraena

     regardless. What was the attention that was brought upon… Noah saying a gay slur on a national televised game eastern conference final game. 

    I don’t care if he makes way less than Kobe or it was directed to a paying customer. WHAT IS SAID IS SAID  WAS CAUGHT and televised. The league needs to check themselves because all these rules and officiating on the court and off is seriously not the love of the game. 

  • Shivaarjun

    i heard they give out bigger fines to better looking people

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dion-Richardson/1201967847 Dion Richardson

    Simply ridiculous!!!! As the Baretta theme went, “Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time…” If the reason for Kobe’s fine is insensitivity to the homosexual community, Noah should fit the same!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1560576133 Arlene A LeBeauf

    Official, Fan whatever, whomever they are still a person, the words are the same. We know that there would be some kind of exception to the rule answer from whomever gave the fine..

  • http://twitter.com/Diandra_M Diandra M.

    Him being fined only 50k was definitely unfair.  I don’t give a damn if he made $500 a year, he should have been fined 100k just like Kobe. 

    • lakers#1

      I agree…

  • Devon Mitchell

    If not equal, being directed at a fan, the fine should have been more.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | © 2014 Medium Large, LLC. All Rights Reserved

Medium Large, LLC - All data and information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of the National Basketball Association (NBA), the Los Angeles Lakers, it's employees, or its’ affiliates. LakersNation.com is an independent fan site and not associated with or represent National Basketball Association or the Los Angeles Lakers. Furthermore, LakersNation.com makes no representations as to accuracy, suitability, or validity of any information on this website and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

Scroll to top