How to Realistically Solve the Lakers’ Point Guard Issue Reviewed by Momizat on . A ton of critics are speculating that the Lakers will need to acquire a younger, more athletic point guard via trade. Deron Williams is the big name that is bei A ton of critics are speculating that the Lakers will need to acquire a younger, more athletic point guard via trade. Deron Williams is the big name that is bei Rating:
You Are Here: Home » Editorials » How to Realistically Solve the Lakers’ Point Guard Issue

How to Realistically Solve the Lakers’ Point Guard Issue

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

A ton of critics are speculating that the Lakers will need to acquire a younger, more athletic point guard via trade. Deron Williams is the big name that is being urged for general manager Mitch Kupchak and owner Jerry Buss to acquire. This would indeed be more than pleasing to Laker fans as Williams’ star power and great abilities at the point guard position would not only solve the current position problems but also extend future success for the team.

However, there is a reality that the Lakers most likely cannot afford to pay the high-dollar salary that an acquisition of Deron Williams would acquire. The Lakers are currently operating with an over-$87 million salary. Since Williams is currently receiving a yearly salary of over $16 million, the Lakers would have to offer up core players to stabilize the consumption of a high priced salary like this without facing severe penalties from the new collective barraging agreement.

Under the new CBA, “Teams pay $1 for every $1 their salary is above the luxury-tax threshold in 2011-12 and 2012-13. Starting in 2012-13, teams pay an incremental tax that increases with every $5 million above the tax threshold ($1.50, $1.75, $2.50, $3.25, etc.). Teams that are repeat offenders (paying tax at least four out of the past five seasons) have a tax that is higher still — $1 more at each increment ($2.50, $2.75, $3.50, $4.25, etc.).”*

“When the league was unable to negotiate a hard cap, they settled for the next best thing — a more punitive luxury tax that will make teams think twice before committing to a higher payroll. For example, the Lakers’ tax bill in 2011 (when the tax was dollar-for-dollar) was about $19.9 million. Under the new system, being that far over the tax line would cost them $44.68 million. If they were a repeat offender (paying tax at least four of the previous five years) they would owe $64.58 million!”*

—- Play Fantasy Basketball for Fun & Cash Prizes | Use “LN2011″ 30% Deposit Bonus —-

With the financial restrictions facing the Lakers in acquiring a star point guard with a high price tag, let’s discuss some possibilities that are more realistic for the organization. If the Lakers were still to acquire a point guard this season, but one who costs dramatically less, a suitable opportunity would be to go after restricted free agent from Phoenix, Aaron Brooks.

Brooks signed with the Chinese Basketball Association (CBA) while the NBA was locked out. Besides signing an agreement with the Chinese Basketball Association worth $2 million dollars, Brooks also agreed to a contract that would tie him to the CBA until March of this year. While it is likely the struggling Suns will hold onto the rights to Brooks for the remainder of the season to back up Steve Nash, if Brooks does not sign an extension, the Lakers could easily pick him up this summer. This would be a more cost effective solution for the Lakers.

Brooks is under contract with the Suns for $2.9 million per year. If you compare his yearly earnings to Luke Walton, who is receiving $5.8 million this year, you can see how the Lakers need to make some financial changes that make sense.

However, picking up another point guard without letting go of a point guard could create some problems. If that happens, the Lakers would have four point guards fighting for minutes. The aging Fisher has been struggling on both ends of the court, but enough can’t be said about what he brings to the team. Fisher has a player option for next season, which I’m sure he won’t exercise. In fact, if he makes any changes it will be to retire.

With a better and more confident Steve Blake now basically equally sharing the minutes played with Derek Fisher, the question facing the Lakers is “is that enough?”

Next Page: What Can They Do With What They Have?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

Pages: 1 2

About The Author

Elizabeth is a graduate from Arizona State University and has her master's from Duquesne University. She is currently an associate editor at Lakers Nation. To read more of Elizabeth's articles click here. You can also follow Elizabeth on Twitter @Gobibs

Number of Entries : 381
  • Ptguard611

    Aaron Brooks would be a great fit for this Laker team. He is an Oregon Duck so we already know he looks good in Yellow.

  • JR

    I’m not sure about Brooks defense but I’m sure he’ll help the pg position on offense. And yea, I think Fisher got to teach Morris how to play the game cause Morris has potential for the future.

  • Post Break Up Sex

    anyone know how long JR Smith will be overseas for? The remainder of the 2012 season? I would sign him and Keith Bogans to back up kobe because Kapono aint cutting it.


    I agree with all of this and the previous posters… I’ve also been wondering if the Lakers are considering JR Smith… he’s thru in China in March and unrestricted… he’s tearing it up in China.  I’d like him or Kmart Kenyon Martin on the Lakers and Dwight then get rid of bynum and gasol.  Im not a huge fan of Brooks and I think the lakers can win with the new players until a trade can be made for a better pt guard.

  • http://twitter.com/DeLanoCorleone DeLano Parker

    I would trade Metta World Piece and second rounder for Micheal Beasley…

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | © 2014 Medium Large, LLC. All Rights Reserved

Medium Large, LLC - All data and information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of the National Basketball Association (NBA), the Los Angeles Lakers, it's employees, or its’ affiliates. LakersNation.com is an independent fan site and not associated with or represent National Basketball Association or the Los Angeles Lakers. Furthermore, LakersNation.com makes no representations as to accuracy, suitability, or validity of any information on this website and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

Scroll to top