Wisconsin Protest
#1
Posted 18 February 2011 - 02:05 PM
1. Gov wants to eliminate collective bargaining
2. Gov wants to control Medicaid
3. Gov wants to make public employees contribute more to their benefits which results in take home pay
4. Gov claims this is needed to fix budget shortfall
5. Gov created budget shortfall for the fiscal year by passing 3 bills giving tax cuts for business his first few days in office
Those where were never in a union won't understand the importance of collective bargaining and like Byron may think all public employees are worthless and don't work.
#2
Posted 18 February 2011 - 02:09 PM
#3
Posted 18 February 2011 - 02:14 PM
#4
Posted 18 February 2011 - 02:34 PM
#7
Posted 18 February 2011 - 03:27 PM
Bryon, on 18 February 2011 - 02:34 PM, said:
Congrats on the Cats winning the pac-10 championship this year
What if the NBA players union couldn't collective bargin. Or collective barganing was outlawed in the USA? Would things be better or worse?
#8
Posted 18 February 2011 - 03:35 PM
Mohican83, on 18 February 2011 - 03:27 PM, said:
What if the NBA players union couldn't collective bargin. Or collective barganing was outlawed in the USA? Would things be better or worse?
#10
Posted 18 February 2011 - 06:44 PM
#11
Posted 18 February 2011 - 07:02 PM
Mohican83, on 18 February 2011 - 02:05 PM, said:
1. Gov wants to eliminate collective bargaining
2. Gov wants to control Medicaid
3. Gov wants to make public employees contribute more to their benefits which results in take home pay
4. Gov claims this is needed to fix budget shortfall
5. Gov created budget shortfall for the fiscal year by passing 3 bills giving tax cuts for business his first few days in office
Those where were never in a union won't understand the importance of collective bargaining and like Byron may think all public employees are worthless and don't work.
This is the same thing that caused the American automakers to fail. Because of union domination causing higher wages, the automakers did not focus on fuel efficient cars because they were not profitable, while Japan and South Korea automakers were able to make fuel-efficient cars that were profitable. Then as gas prices increase, people don't buy these large cars the American automakers are cranking out, causing them to go bankrupt. When you have an institution that is dominated by a union that only cares about what is good for the employees with no accountability, and not the kids or customers, you end up with sub-standard products at higher costs than you would in a free market.
And even with Wisconsin cutting the business tax, they still have a higher rate than Illinois. However, due to the large amounts of corruption throughout Illinois and Chicago politics, Wisconsin is a more favorable place to do business than Illinois due to lower corruption taxes. In Illinois, they are talking about cutting pensions for current employees. That's ridiculous. A pension is a promise that you must honor. If you need to reform it, you do not cut what was previously promised. You apply it to new workers. I will end with this disclaimer: I am a democrat, but I do not agree with them on certain issues like this.
I worked on a local campaign this past election cycle (for a Republican who does not agree with his party on several issues), he is from Flint, MI, I told him this, he was like that's exactly right. He also said Roger & Me by Michael Moore is pretty accurate, even if he is a nutjob.


00-01-02. 09-10-11. Re-peat 3-peat.
#12
Posted 22 February 2011 - 02:44 PM
Nanizm
"Unions were formed to protect people back in the day when they were really being taken advantage of…not for multi millionaires like in the NBA and MLB. Unions disgust me now."
I guess U R 2 young to remember the NBA of the 70s and early 80s when the players would have to play 3 games in a row on the road. People complain about the players being millionaires but rarely complain about actors who are also in a union. Unions bargain with employers. If the employers suck at negotiating, why blame the union. Next accused defendents won't be able to have lawyers
Kyle
Would U rather have each employee go in and negotiate everything themselves.
BuckeyeLakerCub
Wisconsin had a budget surplus for this fiscal year. The new Gov came in and gave tax breaks to business in the 1st few days in office. Now he acts like he needs to do this to balance the budget. The Koch Brothers game heavily to his campaign. The true issue in Wisconsin is busting the union because unions usually give to DEMOCRATS. This guy and others like him are trying to tilt the deck in favor of the republicans. The union has already said the employees would pay more of their healthcare and pension. Also not the police and firefighters union are exempt. Those union gave money to the Gov.
#13
Posted 22 February 2011 - 03:57 PM


00-01-02. 09-10-11. Re-peat 3-peat.
#14
Posted 22 February 2011 - 04:17 PM
#15
Posted 22 February 2011 - 04:23 PM
#16
Posted 22 February 2011 - 08:34 PM


00-01-02. 09-10-11. Re-peat 3-peat.
#17
Posted 22 February 2011 - 08:37 PM
BuckeyeLakerCub, on 22 February 2011 - 08:34 PM, said:
I agree with you. But I don't think getting rid of collective bargaining accomplishes that.
#18
Posted 22 February 2011 - 09:28 PM
Kyle, on 22 February 2011 - 08:37 PM, said:


00-01-02. 09-10-11. Re-peat 3-peat.
#19
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:18 AM
#20
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:50 AM
BuckeyeLakerCub
The school district authorizes positions. Your 7 administrator issue has nothing to do with Unions. Usually when there are positions like principal and assistant principal or superintendent and assistant superintendent. The assistant is there to deal with day to day operations while the top person handles the overall and administrative issues
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










