Pac-10 appears ready to become Pac-16
#1
Posted 09 June 2010 - 10:03 PM
With Nebraska apparently ready to leave the Big 12 for the Big Ten, the Pac-10 is set to offer membership to several other Big 12 schools.
According to the Los Angeles Times' website, the Pac-10 is hoping to bring in Oklahoma, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma State and Colorado in 2012.
"There's no doubt the 16-team deal is what we're after," a Pac-10 source told Bay Area News Group. "The linchpin is Nebraska (leaving for the Big Ten), because Texas wants to stay where they are. But if they feel the Big 12's falling apart, they're going to come West."
# The NCAA has dealt USC a two-year bowl ban and a loss of more than 20 football scholarships among other sanctions, a source with knowledge of the situation told the Los Angeles Times.
The NCAA has conducted a four-year investigation regarding allegations centered on former football player Reggie Bush and former basketball player O.J. Mayo.
# Suspended Oregon quarterback Jeremiah Masoli was kicked off the team two days after a police officer cited him for marijuana possession and driving infractions.
Coach Chip Kelly already had suspended Masoli for the 2010 season after the quarterback pleaded guilty to burglary for his role in the theft of laptops and a guitar from a fraternity.
#2
Posted 10 June 2010 - 10:00 AM
#3
Posted 10 June 2010 - 02:05 PM
#4
Posted 10 June 2010 - 02:07 PM
#6
Posted 14 June 2010 - 08:31 AM
A report Sunday from Chip Brown of Orangebloods.com states that, while Colorado and Nebraska have already left, a retooled 10-team Big 12 may be able to stay together if conference commissioner Dan Beebe can secure a substantial television contract. Texas is reportedly considering all options and would be amenable to earning as much as $17 million per season under the new deal.
In the same article, Brown notes that Texas A&M “has been in deep discussions with the SEC and as of Saturday night had enough votes on its Board of Regents to join the SEC” rather than potentially following Texas and company to the Pac-10. The SEC, which covets Texas and Oklahoma for expansion, would settle on adding Texas A&M due to the expanded reach it would receive in the Dallas and Houston television markets.
[UPDATE: Texas A&M turned down an official offer to join the Pac-10 on Sunday.]
However, if Texas decides to remain in the Big 12 – Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State are tied-in as well – chances are Texas A&M would also stay put.
Should Texas A&M choose to join the SEC, it’s 100-year rivalry with Texas would be in jeopardy, but it would pick up its old natural rivalry with Arkansas, which flourished at one time in the now defunct Southwest Conference.
#7
Posted 14 June 2010 - 10:07 AM
Derelict, on 14 June 2010 - 08:31 AM, said:
A report Sunday from Chip Brown of Orangebloods.com states that, while Colorado and Nebraska have already left, a retooled 10-team Big 12 may be able to stay together if conference commissioner Dan Beebe can secure a substantial television contract. Texas is reportedly considering all options and would be amenable to earning as much as $17 million per season under the new deal.
In the same article, Brown notes that Texas A&M “has been in deep discussions with the SEC and as of Saturday night had enough votes on its Board of Regents to join the SEC” rather than potentially following Texas and company to the Pac-10. The SEC, which covets Texas and Oklahoma for expansion, would settle on adding Texas A&M due to the expanded reach it would receive in the Dallas and Houston television markets.
[UPDATE: Texas A&M turned down an official offer to join the Pac-10 on Sunday.]
However, if Texas decides to remain in the Big 12 – Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State are tied-in as well – chances are Texas A&M would also stay put.
Should Texas A&M choose to join the SEC, it’s 100-year rivalry with Texas would be in jeopardy, but it would pick up its old natural rivalry with Arkansas, which flourished at one time in the now defunct Southwest Conference.
#8
Posted 14 June 2010 - 10:13 AM
#9
Posted 14 June 2010 - 10:19 AM
Derelict, on 14 June 2010 - 10:13 AM, said:
and atleast compete for a BCS bowl. Texas and OU make that a much more difficult task.
#10
Posted 14 June 2010 - 01:08 PM
Ron, on 14 June 2010 - 10:19 AM, said:
and atleast compete for a BCS bowl. Texas and OU make that a much more difficult task.
#11
Posted 14 June 2010 - 01:34 PM
#12
Posted 14 June 2010 - 01:36 PM
Real Shalongest, on 14 June 2010 - 01:08 PM, said:
#13
Posted 14 June 2010 - 01:38 PM
Derelict, on 14 June 2010 - 01:34 PM, said:
#14
Posted 14 June 2010 - 01:57 PM
http://texas.rivals....asp?CID=1094038
In a bombshell development that could bring a halt to seismic changes in college realignment, sources tell Orangebloods.com Texas is at the table with the 10 remaining Big 12 schools working on a TV deal put forth by commissioner Dan Beebe that would hold the conference together.
If there's consensus to the deal, and it appears there is, it could be announced as early as Monday, sources said.
According to sources familiar with the deal, Texas stands to earn between $20 million and $25 million in television revenue, including money from its own network. The UT network figures to generate between $3 million and $5 million, according to sources.
According to sources, the deal will mean more money for Texas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma, who all stand receive $20 million from the new deal. The other seven schools in the Big 12 would make between $14 million and $17 million, but would nearly double what they currently receive in TV revenue (roughly $7 million to $9 million).
The deal brokering puts on hold a courtship between Texas and the Pac-10, which all but seemed solidified as of Friday when Nebraska announced it was heading to the Big Ten and Colorado had a press conference with its new commissioner - Larry Scott of the Pac-10.
But as it became clear over the weekend that Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State appeared ready join the Pac-10 and Texas A&M appeared ready to join the SEC, Beebe was able to obtain assurances that a TV deal could be reached paying each of the 10 remaining members of the Big 12 at least $14 million and $17 million. Under Beebe's plan, schools would also be able to explore their own distribution platforms, including networks.
Texas would not be able to pursue those options in the Pac-10, which is planning to launch a conference network in 2012 and would require schools to turn over all of their inventory.
If the Big 12 is able to work out a deal with its 10 remaining teams, it's likely Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott would look to add Utah as the 12th member of his league and launch a conference network in 2012, sources said.
#15
Posted 14 June 2010 - 02:16 PM
#16
Posted 14 June 2010 - 07:03 PM
Ron, on 14 June 2010 - 02:16 PM, said:
#17
Posted 14 June 2010 - 07:39 PM
#18
Posted 14 June 2010 - 09:40 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













