Jump to content


Oakland Raiders


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
975 replies to this topic

#41 Kosar

Kosar

    Hall Of Fame

  • 5,833 posts
  • Location:Anaheim Hills

Posted 11 September 2009 - 03:12 PM

View PostReal Shalongest, on 11 September 2009 - 10:37 AM, said:

It`s now almost a week and still a no show,  :laugh: you gotta love those Raiders. What a phuckin embarrasment this team is to the NFL. This team should be moved to the canadien football league. Oh and take your fans with you to so that the crime rate in CA. goes down. :alright:
It was not that long ago when dudes were excited to go there.

#42 Kosar

Kosar

    Hall Of Fame

  • 5,833 posts
  • Location:Anaheim Hills

Posted 11 September 2009 - 03:15 PM

View PostHonda, on 11 September 2009 - 12:02 PM, said:

The are the football version of the Clippers.
A really good comparison would be with the Baltimore Orioles.
A once proud(eliminates Clippers)franchise being driven into the ground by an old, meddlesome, out of touch owner.

#43 Shal

Shal

    OLIVER CLOTHESOFF

  • 8,402 posts
  • Fav. Player:STEVE GARVEY
  • Fav. Team:DOYERS

Posted 14 September 2009 - 09:02 AM

Hayter you remember you asked me if there is such a thing as a no brainer? Yes tonights game, Chargers should rip the Raidas ass by 17 points or more. Where is my "I`m in the money" emoticon? :football:
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT IS ALWAYS PRONOUNCED INCORRECTLY. WHAT IS IT?

#44 Nanizm

Nanizm

    Super Star

  • 3,725 posts
  • Location:It rhymes with "punting in the dark"
  • Fav. Player:Kobe,Gannon,Bo,Magic,TimBrown
  • Fav. Team:Lakers,Raiders,Dodgers,ASU,

Posted 16 September 2009 - 08:45 PM

why is it that the refs seem to find the obscure interpretation of the rules to overturn a positive play for the Raiders?

#45 EOG

EOG

    Ultra-Hetero LA sports fan

  • 3,398 posts

Posted 16 September 2009 - 09:13 PM

View PostNanizm, on 16 September 2009 - 08:45 PM, said:

why is it that the refs seem to find the obscure interpretation of the rules to overturn a positive play for the Raiders?
because the league hates Al. its a conspiracy to keep them down.

#46 Juan23

Juan23

    Legend

  • 11,639 posts
  • Location:East Los Angeles
  • Fav. Player:Magic Johnson
  • Fav. Team:LAKERS!

Posted 21 September 2009 - 03:04 PM

They Effin WON??? :blink:  :blink:

#47 Nanizm

Nanizm

    Super Star

  • 3,725 posts
  • Location:It rhymes with "punting in the dark"
  • Fav. Player:Kobe,Gannon,Bo,Magic,TimBrown
  • Fav. Team:Lakers,Raiders,Dodgers,ASU,

Posted 21 September 2009 - 04:28 PM

View PostJuan23, on 21 September 2009 - 03:04 PM, said:

They Effin WON??? :blink:  :blink:

Jamarcus was 7 for 24 with 109 passing yards. At one point missed I think 10 straight passes.

Oakland 11 first downs vs. KC 25 first downs

Oakland 166 total yards vs. KC 409 total yards.

Oakland 21 mins time of possession vs. KC 38 mins.

Now who do you think won?

#48 EvenSteven

EvenSteven

    Super Star

  • 11,597 posts
  • Fav. Player:Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 21 September 2009 - 05:40 PM

Jamarcus Russell is better suited to play linebacker or d-lineman.
Posted ImagePosted Image

#49 EL GRANDE WHOPPO

EL GRANDE WHOPPO

    Hostile Fucking Dago

  • 6,441 posts
  • Location:Chinatown 91754

Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:05 PM

View PostNanizm, on 21 September 2009 - 04:28 PM, said:

Jamarcus was 7 for 24 with 109 passing yards. At one point missed I think 10 straight passes.

Oakland 11 first downs vs. KC 25 first downs

Oakland 166 total yards vs. KC 409 total yards.

Oakland 21 mins time of possession vs. KC 38 mins.

Now who do you think won?

The Raidas just to phuck with me because I bet Kansas City. Raidas did not actually win this game. Chiefs just lost it. That was some brilliant playcalling by Chiefs before the half because who needs to kick a field goal when you can lose at the end of game by a field goal. More NFL gsames are lost by retarded coaching decisions than are won by good coaching decisions. Congrats to the Raidas for staying close enough to win in a game in which they were badly outplayed.

Edited by Ron, 21 September 2009 - 06:06 PM.


#50 EL GRANDE WHOPPO

EL GRANDE WHOPPO

    Hostile Fucking Dago

  • 6,441 posts
  • Location:Chinatown 91754

Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:07 PM

View PostSteven, on 21 September 2009 - 05:40 PM, said:

Jamarcus Russell is better suited to play linebacker or d-lineman.

I would say he is better suited to stand on the sidelines and hold a clipboard.

#51 Ricky

Ricky

    Just a ghost trying to catch someones Pac-Man

  • 3,032 posts
  • Location:Rancho Cucamonga, California
  • Fav. Player:Kobe Bryant
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:22 PM

View PostEOG, on 16 September 2009 - 09:13 PM, said:

because the league hates Al. its a conspiracy to keep them down.
thank you! at least someone understands

its just like that other conspiracy where Minnesota trade Kevin Garrnet for Al Jefferson, Gerald Green, some sf with a mexican name and picks and the GM that did it was Kevin McHale, who happened to be a Celtic and Danny Angie (GM of Celtics) was also once a celtic...CONSPIRACY!

#52 EL GRANDE WHOPPO

EL GRANDE WHOPPO

    Hostile Fucking Dago

  • 6,441 posts
  • Location:Chinatown 91754

Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:45 PM

View PostRicky, on 21 September 2009 - 06:22 PM, said:

thank you! at least someone understands

its just like that other conspiracy where Minnesota trade Kevin Garrnet for Al Jefferson, Gerald Green, some sf with a mexican name and picks and the GM that did it was Kevin McHale, who happened to be a Celtic and Danny Angie (GM of Celtics) was also once a celtic...CONSPIRACY!

Was it a conspiracy when the Lakers got Gasol from Memphis for a bag of crap? Jerry West also helped broker that deal, supposedly.

#53 Shal

Shal

    OLIVER CLOTHESOFF

  • 8,402 posts
  • Fav. Player:STEVE GARVEY
  • Fav. Team:DOYERS

Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:39 PM

View PostNanizm, on 21 September 2009 - 04:28 PM, said:

Jamarcus was 7 for 24 with 109 passing yards. At one point missed I think 10 straight passes.

Oakland 11 first downs vs. KC 25 first downs

Oakland 166 total yards vs. KC 409 total yards.

Oakland 21 mins time of possession vs. KC 38 mins.

Now who do you think won?
:blink:  :lmao: nice game plan Raidas
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT IS ALWAYS PRONOUNCED INCORRECTLY. WHAT IS IT?

#54 Nanizm

Nanizm

    Super Star

  • 3,725 posts
  • Location:It rhymes with "punting in the dark"
  • Fav. Player:Kobe,Gannon,Bo,Magic,TimBrown
  • Fav. Team:Lakers,Raiders,Dodgers,ASU,

Posted 23 September 2009 - 12:47 PM

i'm looking at the schedule for the Raiders...i can see 9 wins. That might be good enough to win the Division; that means playoff home game.

#55 Shal

Shal

    OLIVER CLOTHESOFF

  • 8,402 posts
  • Fav. Player:STEVE GARVEY
  • Fav. Team:DOYERS

Posted 27 September 2009 - 05:07 PM

I want to take a moment right now to congratulate the Raiders for making me look like a jackass today :mooning:  :loser:  :bird:
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT IS ALWAYS PRONOUNCED INCORRECTLY. WHAT IS IT?

#56 Ricky

Ricky

    Just a ghost trying to catch someones Pac-Man

  • 3,032 posts
  • Location:Rancho Cucamonga, California
  • Fav. Player:Kobe Bryant
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:27 PM

damn it man...i beat the broncos 28-0 on madden...

#57 Honda

Honda

    There's only one of me

  • 5,109 posts

Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:30 PM

I am guessing they are not going to win 8 games? :lmao:

#58 Ricky

Ricky

    Just a ghost trying to catch someones Pac-Man

  • 3,032 posts
  • Location:Rancho Cucamonga, California
  • Fav. Player:Kobe Bryant
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:32 PM

View PostHonda, on 27 September 2009 - 06:30 PM, said:

I am guessing they are not going to win 8 games? :lmao:
no we wont

we wont more than 5 games, but even if they wont, i wont jump the ship UNLIKE SOME PEOPLE

#59 Honda

Honda

    There's only one of me

  • 5,109 posts

Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:36 PM

Ah Shal is going to miss you for that time you said you are going to be away for betting against Ron.

#60 EOG

EOG

    Ultra-Hetero LA sports fan

  • 3,398 posts

Posted 27 September 2009 - 07:38 PM

View PostRicky, on 27 September 2009 - 06:32 PM, said:

no we wont

we wont more than 5 games, but even if they wont, i wont jump the ship UNLIKE SOME PEOPLE

that SOME PEOPLE would be me. i'm ready to jump. every man for himself.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Bing (1)