Jump to content


Oakland Raiders


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
975 replies to this topic

#141 Juan23

Juan23

    Legend

  • 11,639 posts
  • Location:East Los Angeles
  • Fav. Player:Magic Johnson
  • Fav. Team:LAKERS!

Posted 12 October 2009 - 11:34 AM

Ruck these Faiders!!!    :football:

#142 EL GRANDE WHOPPO

EL GRANDE WHOPPO

    Hostile Fucking Dago

  • 6,441 posts
  • Location:Chinatown 91754

Posted 12 October 2009 - 11:40 AM

View PostTim, on 12 October 2009 - 10:31 AM, said:

They played their best game against the Chargers.
Shot their wad in week #1 to give their fans some hope. Chargers also played like sh1t for most of that game.

#143 TZT

TZT

    Rocky Mountain Douche

  • 6,279 posts
  • Location:Highlands Ranch, CO
  • Fav. Player:Tony Gwynn
  • Fav. Team:Chargers

Posted 12 October 2009 - 11:52 AM

View PostRon, on 12 October 2009 - 11:40 AM, said:

Shot their wad in week #1 to give their fans some hope. Chargers also played like sh1t for most of that game.
Then the Raiders got lucky against the Chefs.

Edited by Tim, 12 October 2009 - 12:23 PM.


#144 Juan23

Juan23

    Legend

  • 11,639 posts
  • Location:East Los Angeles
  • Fav. Player:Magic Johnson
  • Fav. Team:LAKERS!

Posted 12 October 2009 - 11:52 AM

NO HOPE FOR THEM

#145 EL GRANDE WHOPPO

EL GRANDE WHOPPO

    Hostile Fucking Dago

  • 6,441 posts
  • Location:Chinatown 91754

Posted 12 October 2009 - 01:09 PM

View PostTim, on 12 October 2009 - 11:52 AM, said:

Then the Raiders got lucky against the Chefs.
Then reality set in. NFL should set up a playoff for worst 8 teams. Rams, Raiders, Browns, Tampa,ect. Think of the excitement they could generate. Would be very similar to Bills-Browns classic yesterday.

#146 Ricky

Ricky

    Just a ghost trying to catch someones Pac-Man

  • 3,032 posts
  • Location:Rancho Cucamonga, California
  • Fav. Player:Kobe Bryant
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:15 PM

44-7...

#147 Honda

Honda

    There's only one of me

  • 5,109 posts

Posted 12 October 2009 - 06:28 PM

Eli Manning is sickk, he was like Kobe when Kobe is sickkk/injuried.

#148 Mohican83

Mohican83

    Rebel

  • 8,854 posts

Posted 12 October 2009 - 06:37 PM

I tried to watch the raider game but CBS switched to another gamePosted Image .  Russell is getting most of the heat but lets face it, the whole team is in the toilet.  The corner opposite Naimi sucks.  The pass blocking stinks, their wide outs can't run routes correctly or get separation.  The Tight End is the only viable recieving option.  Why doesn't M. Bush start and get most of the carries, especially when McFadden is out.  The Giants had 3rd and 24 and got a first downPosted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image  No raiders


More basketball, Less Talk

#149 EOG

EOG

    Ultra-Hetero LA sports fan

  • 3,398 posts

Posted 13 October 2009 - 03:50 PM

the 3rd and 24 play was classic Raider defense. just shows once again the cavernous gap in talent between the Raiders and the Giants (and probably most teams.)

#150 Juan23

Juan23

    Legend

  • 11,639 posts
  • Location:East Los Angeles
  • Fav. Player:Magic Johnson
  • Fav. Team:LAKERS!

Posted 13 October 2009 - 06:14 PM

Good Post Mo  :peace:

#151 Mohican83

Mohican83

    Rebel

  • 8,854 posts

Posted 13 October 2009 - 10:55 PM

I would have liked to watch the whole game but CBS did not deem it worthy of my time.  I do know, the offensive line is not very good at pass blocking, the wide outs don't know how to run proper routes nor get separation, their qb has zero confidence in his receivers, the offensive line, the play calling and his own ability.  The receivers can never get separation between themselves and their defender.  Also, why in the freak is Justin Fargas starting over Michael Bush?  McFadden I understand, but Bush is a much better back than Fargas who hasn't been the same since his knee surgery in college
More basketball, Less Talk

#152 Shal

Shal

    OLIVER CLOTHESOFF

  • 8,402 posts
  • Fav. Player:STEVE GARVEY
  • Fav. Team:DOYERS

Posted 14 October 2009 - 12:25 PM

View PostMohican83, on 13 October 2009 - 10:55 PM, said:

I would have liked to watch the whole game but CBS did not deem it worthy of my time.  I do know, the offensive line is not very good at pass blocking, the wide outs don't know how to run proper routes nor get separation, their qb has zero confidence in his receivers, the offensive line, the play calling and his own ability.  The receivers can never get separation between themselves and their defender.  Also, why in the freak is Justin Fargas starting over Michael Bush?  McFadden I understand, but Bush is a much better back than Fargas who hasn't been the same since his knee surgery in college
Wow you must have some big balls to watch a game that includes the Raidas. I would rather watch myself pluck my butt hairs then to watch a Raida Game.
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT IS ALWAYS PRONOUNCED INCORRECTLY. WHAT IS IT?

#153 Ricky

Ricky

    Just a ghost trying to catch someones Pac-Man

  • 3,032 posts
  • Location:Rancho Cucamonga, California
  • Fav. Player:Kobe Bryant
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 18 October 2009 - 07:39 PM

WOOOOOOOOOOOH

2 wins

3 more to go

#154 Juan23

Juan23

    Legend

  • 11,639 posts
  • Location:East Los Angeles
  • Fav. Player:Magic Johnson
  • Fav. Team:LAKERS!

Posted 18 October 2009 - 09:57 PM

They F***in won???? :blink:  :blink:  :football:  :blink:  :blink:

#155 Shal

Shal

    OLIVER CLOTHESOFF

  • 8,402 posts
  • Fav. Player:STEVE GARVEY
  • Fav. Team:DOYERS

Posted 19 October 2009 - 08:08 AM

Raidas still suck! nothing has changed.
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT IS ALWAYS PRONOUNCED INCORRECTLY. WHAT IS IT?

#156 Nanizm

Nanizm

    Super Star

  • 3,725 posts
  • Location:It rhymes with "punting in the dark"
  • Fav. Player:Kobe,Gannon,Bo,Magic,TimBrown
  • Fav. Team:Lakers,Raiders,Dodgers,ASU,

Posted 19 October 2009 - 08:16 AM

I knew it all along.
Look how better the defense plays when they get a hint of offensive production.
It is a big difference when the offense is not going 3 and out every time.
I dont see this as a sign they are turning it around. All of the offensive woes are still there.

Edited by Nanizm, 19 October 2009 - 08:18 AM.


#157 Shal

Shal

    OLIVER CLOTHESOFF

  • 8,402 posts
  • Fav. Player:STEVE GARVEY
  • Fav. Team:DOYERS

Posted 19 October 2009 - 08:30 AM

View PostNanizm, on 19 October 2009 - 08:16 AM, said:

I knew it all along.
Look how better the defense plays when they get a hint of offensive production.
It is a big difference when the offense is not going 3 and out every time.
I dont see this as a sign they are turning it around. All of the offensive woes are still there.
I`m glad you are not a miopic Raida fan, and you still see the problems that consist with your football team. Most batos would say they are going to the superbowl after an impressive performance against the Eagles.
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT IS ALWAYS PRONOUNCED INCORRECTLY. WHAT IS IT?

#158 EvenSteven

EvenSteven

    Super Star

  • 11,597 posts
  • Fav. Player:Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
  • Fav. Team:Lakers

Posted 19 October 2009 - 10:10 AM

They really won that muthaeffer?

My sincere apologies to the Raidas Nation! :peace:
Posted ImagePosted Image

#159 Kyle

Kyle

    10-inches, around

  • 6,451 posts
  • Location:Stanton, CA
  • Fav. Player:Bobby Ryan, Jared Weaver
  • Fav. Team:Anaheim Ducks

Posted 19 October 2009 - 12:00 PM

Philadelphia should be ashamed of themselfs.
Posted Image

#160 EL GRANDE WHOPPO

EL GRANDE WHOPPO

    Hostile Fucking Dago

  • 6,441 posts
  • Location:Chinatown 91754

Posted 19 October 2009 - 01:58 PM

View PostKyle, on 19 October 2009 - 12:00 PM, said:

Philadelphia should be ashamed of themselfs.
Donovan McCrap said that it was embarassing. Andy Reid refuses to run the ball and should have been run out of town. Got lucky just to make playoffs last year and had a nice little run to save himself. Eagles will never win Super Bowl with their current style of play.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users