Home
Dwight Howard, Golden State Rumors Shouldn’t Be Worried About Reviewed by Momizat on . Another day, another team. Dwight Howard's list of possible destinations has reportedly expanded to include the Golden St. Warriors. While nothing in the NBA is Another day, another team. Dwight Howard's list of possible destinations has reportedly expanded to include the Golden St. Warriors. While nothing in the NBA is Rating:
You Are Here: Home » Editorials » Dwight Howard, Golden State Rumors Shouldn’t Be Worried About

Dwight Howard, Golden State Rumors Shouldn’t Be Worried About

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

NBA: Los Angeles Lakers at Miami HeatAnother day, another team. Dwight Howard’s list of possible destinations has reportedly expanded to include the Golden St. Warriors. While nothing in the NBA is impossible, the English language doesn’t have a word for the closest something can be to being impossible without actually calling it impossible.

Here are three big reasons why Dwight Howard won’t be a member of the Golden State Warriors next season:

Money

Most importantly, the Warriors don’t have any cap space. If Dwight wants to be a Warrior, the Lakers would have to be willing to engage in a sign-and-trade deal. Not only would that involve Dwight taking $30 million less than he could get if he re-signed with the Lakers, but when he finds out what the Warriors roster would look like after hearing what the Lakers would want in exchange for him, his interest in moving up north would disappear quicker than you could say ‘Joe Barry Carroll’.

Familiarity Breeds Contempt

The Lakers and the Warriors have only made two trades in the last 23 years. Terry Teagle for Shawn Vandiver in 1990 and Pig Miller for Dwayne Whitfield in 1994. It is extremely rare for teams within the same division to make a trade and even more rare when a player the caliber of Dwight Howard is at the center of it. I know the Suns traded Steve Nash to the Lakers last year but that was more a case of the Suns accommodating Nash for years of loyalty so that he could play for a contender and still be close to his kids.

There’s a reason why teams don’t like making trades within their division. Who wants to be haunted by the player they gave away for years and years? Teams don’t prefer to make trades within their own conference, let alone their own division. Do people really think the Lakers would sign-and-trade 27-year-old Dwight to the Warriors and help create a divisional dynasty with Dwight, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, and Harrison Barnes?

—- Check out Lakers big man Dwight Howard’s player bio here! —-

Keep in mind that the Warriors can’t sign Dwight outright without the Lakers engaging in a sign-and-trade. So if it’s up to the Lakers, why would they help accommodate it? The answer is they wouldn’t. Not unless they’re getting back at least two of those aforementioned three. Bill Simmons throwing out an Andrew Bogut and Harrison Barnes trade idea for Dwight makes absolutely no sense for the Lakers.

**I’ll delve further into Simmons’ latest column on Dwight later this week.

History

The Lakers have been on the receiving end of a sign-and-trade, most memorably when they traded Caron Butler to the Wizards for a signed-and-traded Kwame Brown. However, the only time I can recall the Lakers ever engaging in any type of sign-and-trade deal where they were on the signing-and-trading side was when they had to sign-and-trade the unofficially retired Aaron McKie so they could make the salaries work in the Pau trade.

There are a few reasons why the Lakers don’t involve themselves in sign-and-trades. The most important one is that nobody ever leaves the Lakers by choice. They only leave if either the Lakers don’t want them anymore or if another team offers them more money. That’s it.

When Kobe Bryant flirted with the Chicago Bulls in the Summer of 2004, Jerry Buss preemptively stated that he would not engage in a sign-and-trade if Kobe decided he wanted to join the Bulls. I can’t imagine the Lakers wouldn’t have a similar stance this year if Dwight also wanted to sign with a team that didn’t have the cap space to sign him outright. The league’s new collective bargaining agreement not only prohibits free agents from getting any more money in a sign-and-trade than they could get just by signing with a team outright, but it also prohibits teams more than $4 million over the luxury tax from engaging in sign-and-trades. In other words, the only teams to take serious when it comes to Dwight fleeing the Lakers are the Rockets, the Mavericks, and the Hawks.

Keep all of this in mind going forward since there are sure to be more teams rumored to be on Dwight’s alleged wish list until the official free agency period begins.

—————————————————————————————————————–

Did you see Dr. Buss honored at the 2013 Sports Spectacular gala? If not, check out our video below and don’t forget to click here to subscribe to our YouTube Channel!


Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter

About The Author

Andrew Ungvari is a Los Angeles native and a Lakers season ticket holder since 1989. Follow him on twitter @DrewUnga.

Number of Entries : 48
  • Josh

    I don’t like Dwight, but the Lakers will be terrible next season if he leaves. They will only have a $3 million exception to sign a free agent plus veterans minimum contacts.

  • G4Real

    haha, I remember when we always feared losing our free agents to the Lakers down south. Now the tables have turned! Karma is a b&*%h suckers!

    • AndrewUngvari

      What does karma have to do with anything? What garbage of yours were you afraid of losing to the Lakers? Considering the Lakers won 3 of 4 from the Warriors this season, you might wanna rethink that.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | © 2014 Medium Large, LLC. All Rights Reserved

Medium Large, LLC - All data and information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of the National Basketball Association (NBA), the Los Angeles Lakers, it's employees, or its’ affiliates. LakersNation.com is an independent fan site and not associated with or represent National Basketball Association or the Los Angeles Lakers. Furthermore, LakersNation.com makes no representations as to accuracy, suitability, or validity of any information on this website and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

Scroll to top